For or against nuclear weapons?

Have a topic or current event in the news that you would like to discuss?

for or against nuclear weapons

for
19
20%
against
73
76%
i don`t realy care
3
3%
 
Total votes : 95

Postby Samppa on Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:35 pm

Been away a while..

As far as I know, goliat is right.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Okay.

Postby tenguage12 on Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:07 pm

Okay, then explain to me why we had to go there? I mean explain to me why are mean are dieing? I'm sure they just didnt go there to be heroic thats nonsence. Another thing, i doubt we would sacrafice are men for no reason at all, i think you better start listeing to the news again -.-
Image
tenguage12
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Mountvernon, Illinois

Postby Samppa on Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:20 am

I think you best stop watching Fox, there's absolutely no evidence of wmd in iraq, nor did they threaten anyone. As far as I know, saddam kicked the inspectors out, possibly to dick with the west, and then there's two possibilities. Either the us believed that iraq had wmd and were going to nuke someone and wanted to stop them, or it provided an ample opportunity to get a stronger grip on the east and possibly gain something.

Who knows, I ain't going to make allegations as I have no idea. All I know is saddam didn't threaten anyone. Sure, he kicked the inspectors out, but that doesn't prove anything.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Re: Okay.

Postby Boso on Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:37 pm

tenguage12 wrote:Okay, then explain to me why we had to go there? I mean explain to me why are mean are dieing? I'm sure they just didnt go there to be heroic thats nonsence. Another thing, i doubt we would sacrafice are men for no reason at all, i think you better start listeing to the news again -.-


One answer to all your questions - MONEY. Nobody cares about 100, 200 ... 2000 dead soldiers.
Boso
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:24 am
Location: Bulgaria

Postby bwolf on Sat Mar 18, 2006 5:36 am

nuclear weapons, were invented for idiot leaders that
just want power at all cost, and something to show
they have it...

nuclear weapons, are in no way good or for the use or
perpose of good in any way or shape or form.

nuclear weapons, are also what is going to kill the
humian race in all likely hood.
bwolf
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:23 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby illfusion on Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:16 am

im in a way against the use of nuke bot not in the possesion of nuke... because

1. if a cuntry say the u.s.a has 10 000 nukes and says china plan on attacking with nuke's would they risk having a global conflict on theyre hand?

2.if it can stop the death of millions around the globe by blowing someone.. id say yes.... kill the *BULLY* and keep the good person alive

3.and nuclear fusion aint a bad thing at all dont forget nuclear power plant Very Happy they do provide a lot of power for the computer that we are using right now.. and there are lots of way to use it but as long is it is peacefull
.............
illfusion
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 9:41 am
Location: longueuil,qc.canada

Postby Samppa on Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:44 pm

Fusion ain't profitable yet, we only have fission to play with.

Regarding killing the 'bully', you're only killing innocent people that happened to be born into that country. And what's stopping the other country from revenge, the nukes would be detected before they hit the ground allowing time for retaliation.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Postby crack0 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:57 pm

It is good example from Dan Brown "Daemons and Angels" what may happend
even if the idea was to do good Wink

and about the fusion being profitable or not take a look at "CERN"
(in Swicherland ) they have some good ideas

I'm against nuclear tehnology for being used as a weapon however I belive we can not put an end to research simply becouse it is in humans nature to search for answers
Remember happiness can be found even in the darkest of times who only remembers to turn on the light
crack0
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: serbia

Postby Jokke on Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:49 pm

I think that Nuclear Weapons are very bad invention. USA should destroy all nuclear wepons that they have. Becouse if they start launching nukes to some country that country maybe shoot them back whit same arsenal. And the World War 3 has begun..... Finaly there will be no Eart.
Jokke
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:09 pm

Postby Samppa on Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:07 pm

Good ole US of A ain't gonna fire no nukes at anyone, until some other country does it first.

I'd be more worried about Iran and N Korea.
And France Wink
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Postby MMDollar on Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:08 pm

Ribl wrote:I'm REALLY against these weapons... Every country who has nuclear weapons should be hit by them - so they see how much dmg they do...


I'm against this too but i don't think that if some country has a nuclear weapon they have to be hit by the world.I think that they have to talk the way out
MMDollar
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: Bulgaria/Bourgas

Postby bluebell on Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:28 am

I had to go and vote for "For". But the only reason I did that is because what if we have a situtation like the movie Armageddon? But otherwise I would never want another Atom bomb hit on any part of our Earth.
bluebell
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:38 am

Postby Samppa on Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:58 am

Besides, the World knows what damage the bombs can inflict, what with all the testing they've done.

There's already a new method of getting rid of asteroids heading for earth which seems pretty good, and besides - I don't want to have to be scared silly when a space rocket carrying a nuclear bomb is taking off. That thing blows in the atmosphere..
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Postby goliat on Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:41 pm

Nuclear bombs are realy very bad but they are just a part of the war. I am agains every kind of military actions.
goliat
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: bulgaria

Postby roogog on Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:20 pm

Thing is nuclear power and weapons have been invented and are here to stay until we invent something better for fuel, or until they are replaced by something the military like better..or until we become a bit more enlightened Wink
roogog
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:48 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Serious Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron