For or against nuclear weapons?

Have a topic or current event in the news that you would like to discuss?

for or against nuclear weapons

for
19
20%
against
73
76%
i don`t realy care
3
3%
 
Total votes : 95

Postby Samppa on Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:10 pm

Yucca Mountain?
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is RomMaster's Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(" )_(" ) signature to help him gain world domination.
Samppa
Phoenix Veteran
Phoenix Veteran
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Postby format on Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:22 pm

I'm Against nuclear weapons. They are making terrible damage for Mother Earth and for us. Radiation & cancer for many years...This weapon should be destroy or use against countrys which have them. Thats my opinion.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sry for my english but i'm still learning. If u have some suggestion about my english pls write PM to me Smile
format
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:22 pm
Location: :: Poland :: Bydgoszcz::

Postby hc on Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:21 pm

^Indeed.

Insted of using all those money on research and building, use it on education!
hc
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:48 pm
Location: Norway

Postby uzair on Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:40 pm

I am definately against Nuclear weapons.

Why?

1. Spreads radiation
2. Mass destruction
3. No specific target because destruction is so powerful that large area including civilians are killed.
4. Spreads terror
uzair
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:35 pm

Postby alg8662 on Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:59 pm

I think if other countries have them, we are deliberately compromising ourselves and leaving ourselves open to attack by not having some of our own.
alg8662
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:22 pm

Postby vaurdan on Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:32 am

TacOps wrote:How can ppl be so ignorant and actually vote for " For " . Where you guys been? Has our past world history not taught you anything? I understand everyone has there own opinion.

al_tyranny that was the most ignorant thing i have ever read in my life. Its a poor excuse for not using your head. You know the damages nukes caused and are still causing to this very day? I doubt it or you wouldn't post such giberish.

i think that too :@
vaurdan
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:15 am

Postby spyke112 on Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:42 pm

100% against it man :O
It is sick how much damage it does, like after the bomb exploded over Hiroshima, it started raining with radiated water, and lots of just drank the water, because they were burned, but what they did'nt knew was that it would kill them hours later Sad
spyke112
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Denmark

Postby uzunov on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:05 pm

I`m Defenitely against!!! Because of myself, because of my future children, I don`t want to make them suffer because of our foolish nowadays. This is the most frighting why to make peace { this is the excuse that all politcs in us says } Nuclear for peace- don`t speak bull sh*ts please...Politics shouldn`t exist..they make people to cry speaking about how they will create one new good world..and using nuclear for good ...Humankind will die because of it`s stupidness
It`s no matter what you know, it`s matter what you can prove...
uzunov
Valued Member
Valued Member
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby sayuz on Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:32 pm

if i were to live in a big country with many enemies i would be for atomic weapons, but I live in a small country, a country that many of you don`t even know were it is, so i`m against the atomic bombs because a medium size nuke can kill 3/4 of the popultion of Romania, my little contry
sayuz
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:09 pm
Location: Romania

Postby gtsilosani on Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:23 am

I am really against it, although i am sure alot of countries do have them and we wont even know about it. Nobody wants to be weaker than some other one - because when you get weak someone else takes you over. This is a rule from stone age and even though we are civilized nobody says it but everyone understands
gtsilosani
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:46 pm

Postby mtance on Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:37 pm

against
mtance
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:29 pm

Postby demonio on Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:22 pm

I'm against any kind of weapon.
The people MUST to learn how to use the tecnology for the good and stop to use tecnologies how can save the world for the bad
demonio
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:03 pm

Postby silentguy on Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:28 pm

i think this is an topic that is almost impossible to decide...
Nuclear weapons are a prime example of weapons that exist so that they don't have to be used. most weapons are a bit like that, but esp. nukes. They exist so that other nuke-owners know that using their own nuke would cause an retaliation that would be at least as destructive (topic mutually assured destruction)
I agree it would be nicer if NOONE had nukes, but that would mean that all people would have to be good enough not to produce any... Do you know the simpsons ep where lisa wishes for world peace? all it takes is someone with a stick to become dictator...
I used to be schizophrenic but we are all right now!

Computer games don't affect kids: I mean, if Pacman affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkend rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetative electronic music...
silentguy
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:16 am
Location: NRW, Germany

Postby TigerWolf on Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:11 pm

I dont see how people could say that they support the use of nukes. Its annoying that the energy we make from neclear power plants is great fuel for nukes. It would be alot better for the environment if we could obtain more of our electricity from neclear power stations.
TigerWolf
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:33 am

Postby Myst on Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:36 pm

TigerWolf wrote:I dont see how people could say that they support the use of nukes. Its annoying that the energy we make from neclear power plants is great fuel for nukes. It would be alot better for the environment if we could obtain more of our electricity from neclear power stations.




actually it would be more better for the environment if we use solar energy (i.e the sun) for our electricity.

And on the note of support/not supporting nuclear weapons; I think we should as a global community store a whole bunch of them on a remote location guarded 24/7 by multinational guards Razz So incase we ever need to protect ourseleves from "other" beings or i dunno an ASTEROID, we can have the necessary tool to do something about it. Wink
Myst
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 1:22 am
Location: USA

PreviousNext

Return to Serious Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron