by Nintendud on Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:12 pm
I don't think there is any problem with it. Gay parents are just as likely to abuse their children as much as straight parents.
No one can say that all straight parents are exemplary in the category of raising children. The same can be said of gay parents.
The only difference is that instead of having a male parent and a female parent, the child have two of one.
Once the child realizes that most kids have a male and female parent, they might ask about it. I'm guessing the reaction would most likely be that the child's dads or moms love each other, while most people love the opposite sex. While it's uncommon, it's not a bad thing at all. I don't see why an answer such as that wouldn't satisfy a child. The topic of sex and reproduction doesn't even have to be touched unless the child asks about it, in which case they can explain that they can't reproduce, and, if the child doesn't already know, that he/she was adopted due to this.
I really don't see the big deal that everyone is making it out to be. If you block gay parents from adopting, which is their only option to raise kids besides inseminating a female or, if they are female, being inseminated, you are denying kids homes. The topic of gays abusing their children is irrelevant, since it's just as common (or, maybe even more common) for straight parents to abuse their kids.
As for the gay parents' effect on the child's sexual orientation, what's the big deal? I doubt that gay parents would force their child/children to be gay. I also doubt that just having gay parents has any significant effect on the sexual orientation of children. I don't believe sexual orientation is a choice (at least in most cases), so I guess that opinion would change my reaction from the other people who are against it. Put it this way: plenty of gays come from straight households.
I just don't think gays should be denied the right to adopt children. It's not right.