To start neutrally, the topic for debate is the protesters in the US rallying for legalization rights for illegal immigrants.
Open for discussion is: EVERYTHING (motives, politicians backing it/repelling it, legal basis, moral basis, etc).
******************************
link: Rallies across U.S. call for illegal immigrant rights
I'm totally in awe of the ignorance of these demonstrators concerning US Law.
link: Immigration rallies sweep through U.S. cities
Hopefully it will not change! It takes a shitload of work for anyone else to get into this country honestly! Letting the ones who sneak in illegally is shafting them greatly! Yes, it sucks that some poor guy and his children came here on a raft, work at an underpaying job and now have to get booted back to his homeland, but he knew what would happen to him if he got caught in the first place."The reason why they don't listen to many migrants is because they cannot vote. But hopefully that will change."
link: Latinos plan boycott to protest immigration bill
Yes, organizing 10 000 people to march through a major Boston street during rush hour ... that's a way to increase support for their cause. So is making people take half an hour to go around one block because of the traffic backup, and so blatantly sticking it to the millions of people who worked to come here legally.Gutierrez, whose group helped to organize a Los Angeles demonstration that attracted at least 200,000 participants last month, called the Senate bill an "encouraging sign" but said it was still too tough on those who want to become citizens.
"We think that the right thing to do is to grant full rights, full equality, under the laws in the Constitution of the United States to all immigrants, period," he said at a press conference.
The second part is just more crap; if the US laws to immigrate here are too strict he should bring that up in the proper place, and by repealing them at that place, not by declaring it's bull and thus suddenly people shouldn't be held responsible for violating it. So far as I know, if a law is still in effect, you will be punished for violating it even if it's later repealed or in the proces of being repealed.
This is the best, isn't it?



