Linux on your Flash Drive!

Discuss anything about technology or computers here, other than programming.

Postby banderlog on Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:27 pm

mm_freak wrote:... Du irrst dich aber. Es sollte "wenn ich mich nicht irre" heißen. =) ....

Да по-хуй, я просто прусь !!! = Yo, dont giv e fak ))) im jast meik mi fun !!!
banderlog
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:48 pm

Postby mm_freak on Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:52 am

banderlog wrote:
mm_freak wrote:... Du irrst dich aber. Es sollte "wenn ich mich nicht irre" heißen. =) ....

Да по-хуй, я просто прусь !!! = Yo, dont giv e fak ))) im jast meik mi fun !!!


Oh well. My cryptanalytic skills failed. =(
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Postby bigburd on Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:03 am

In all honesty I would prefer Linux on a flash disk rather than a CD, especially in an environment where there are a few techs running around having to fix computers, and a separate OS in another type of media like USB would be quite handy. Perhaps you need to get some files off a computer that the windows died in? Plug up a flash stick with Samba on it and you're ready to fly with the files. USB is a bit faster and more reliable than optical media, it may end up being a must for any computer technician.
bigburd
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 5:10 pm
Location: Owensboro, KY, USA

Postby BlueFusionX on Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:01 pm

DAmn Small Linux is probably better. No offense but Linux wasn't really designed for use in a flash drive and what all can you do on a flash drive, really? You should use a Cd.
bluefusionx.com
Web and Software Development
wvance.com
The wVance Weblog
BlueFusionX
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: /usr/local/US/tennessee.sh

Postby Bugs42 on Mon Dec 12, 2005 5:28 am

Having Linux on a Flash drive is nice, though, because you can save to it, whereas if you're running a LiveCD you can't save anything else to the CD.
Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Bugs42
Valued Member
Valued Member
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:48 pm

Postby arckeda on Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:11 am

wow lol soon they wont even need hardrives
arckeda
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:52 pm

Postby ddapue on Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:44 am

I successfully failed at trying this, I installed Puppy linux on my 128mb SanDIsk cruzer mini, and it woudn't boot, my Bios is set up to boot from it ? I found out later that other people had same problem with cruzer.
Is anyone here using it?
Buy, Bye, Windows!
ddapue
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Serbia

Postby mm_freak on Sat Dec 24, 2005 7:39 am

bigburd wrote:USB is a bit faster and more reliable than optical media, it may end up being a must for any computer technician.


Current USB implementations (USB 2.0 with EHCI) are much slower than optical media. Audio CDs are recorded with 44 KHz, 16 bits and two audio channels. In other words: a 1x CD reader reads more than 176 KB/s. Since the speed of a CD drive is measured in audio data rate, a 56x reader reads more than 9.4 MB/s. This beats a USB flash drive, which gets only a few MB/s. Just compare the download time of photos from a USB digicam with the download time of the same files from a CD.
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Previous

Return to Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron