multi disk file server

Discuss anything about technology or computers here, other than programming.

multi disk file server

Postby bat on Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:29 pm

Hello, I have that file server I listed in the pc specs section yesterday, but I'd like to ditch microcrap win2k3. Does anyone have any reccomendations for an OS that is good with multiple hdds? I don't want to have them set up as raid because I have found that if something happens to any of the disks, I tend to lose alot of data. I was thinking about having some kind of samba setup using symlinks to make everything look like it was all on one hdd. Anyway, any reccomendations for something better would be greatly appreciated.
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your microsoft products.
bat
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:10 am
Location: canada

Re: multi disk file server

Postby altmind on Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:56 pm

raid5 and raid10 are fail-safe, if one disk fails, all data can be easily restored. you need only bios supporting it
altmind
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:32 pm

ther is a new tecnology now

Postby rambiga on Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:29 pm

chak this new storeg mechin
rambiga
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:31 pm

Re: ther is a new tecnology now

Postby Ius on Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:19 pm

rambiga wrote:chak this new storeg mechin

That seems to be a non-related video surveillance camera manufacturer?

@TS:
You're somehow right, yet you seem to be only aware of the existance of RAID0 - also known as striping only. Your data will be scattered across two or more disks. If one disk fails, the pieces of your valuable files on the remaining disk(s) have become useless.

However, like Altmind points out, RAID5 and RAID10 (and RAID1) are 'failsafe' as they all make use of the mirroring concept, with the difference being in the use of parity and some variations are combined with the aforementioned striping. Every bit of data will be on two or more disks - if one fails, you can replace it and rebuild the array. For a great overview of the different RAID setups have a look at Wikipedia

As far as I'm aware both Windows and 'nix can handle RAID arrays just fine. Should you not have an onboard raid controller, there are PCI raid controllers out there.
Ius
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:44 pm

well

Postby bat on Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:56 am

Heh, I don't actually want to use raid because it uses alot of space for backups and so on that I would rather use to store files. I am a poor student, Smile with almost no money and only about a tb worth of hdds and just that much in music and tvshows Smile However, since I originally posted this question, I have found the bsd based freenas and the debian based ebox, at freenas.org and ebox-platform.com respectively. Again my problem is in mounting all the disks and getting all the shares up properly, but with this stuff to go on it should be relatively simple to make big shares full of symlinks to other hdds to make everything look like it's in one folder.
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your microsoft products.
bat
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:10 am
Location: canada

Postby daddy2k on Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:45 am

multi file server ... well which protocol do you want to use?
If you want to use FTP (or FTP over TLS) I can recommend drftpd (www.drftpd.org) it's Java based and you can even can make a FTP Cluster with that. It's not really a RAID. More information on the website.
Maybe this application helps you and it's not important which OS you are using
daddy2k
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: Germany

...

Postby bat on Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:21 pm

daddy2k wrote:multi file server ... well which protocol do you want to use?
If you want to use FTP (or FTP over TLS) I can recommend drftpd (www.drftpd.org) it's Java based and you can even can make a FTP Cluster with that. It's not really a RAID. More information on the website.
Maybe this application helps you and it's not important which OS you are using


Heh, thanks for that, I'll definitely give that a look see. I mainly wanted to use samba and nfs to do the filesharing, so now it only comes down to the mountpoints and the stupid filesystems hdds use that you have to specify in the *nix mount command. Smile
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your microsoft products.
bat
Regular
Regular
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:10 am
Location: canada


Return to Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron