Which linux distribution do you use?

Discussion about life, phoenix-network's 'water cooler'

Postby t3h on Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:04 am

Mainly stayed on Mac OS X. Tried out PPCLinux and Yellow Dog before that. Then used Ubuntu, all the while while using OS X mainly. Now making my own distro - Flying Chair Linux.
t3h
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:23 am

Postby banderlog on Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:53 pm

What advantages are you planning in it?
banderlog
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:48 pm

Postby tw33ty on Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:11 am

nice...mail me after u finish it...maybe i can be a beta-tester Wink
tw33ty
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:45 am

Postby mm_freak on Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:26 pm

t3h wrote:Mainly stayed on Mac OS X. Tried out PPCLinux and Yellow Dog before that. Then used Ubuntu, all the while while using OS X mainly. Now making my own distro - Flying Chair Linux.


For the public, or merely for yourself? Like I'm an active coder, but most of my programs are just little helpers or projects I don't want to release.
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Slackware

Postby rafamonte on Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:20 am

Now i'm running Slackware 10.1 on a Pentium MMX 233, with 64mb RAM.

It's a very weak box, i know... but is what i could get...

I'm accepting donations!! Anyone?? Smile
rafamonte
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:42 pm

Postby twentytwo on Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:11 am

Yes but its a very efficient *nix box isn't it Smile Thats one reason i like *nix you can run it on just about anything. Thats what really attracted me to it in the first place Smile Its nice when you can throw old parts laying in your basement together and have a new firewall or dhcp server or even just a shell box.
twentytwo
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:42 am

Postby rafamonte on Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:11 am

Sure!!

I cant do everything that i need with it! And it was not very
expensive to me!
rafamonte
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:42 pm

Postby mm_freak on Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:48 am

rafamonte, I had to live for 7..8 years with a Pentium I 233 MHz with 64 MB RAM (later upgraded it to 128 MB). As a number theoretician it was hard to work with it. =)
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Postby rafamonte on Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:00 am

In my case, i use it just to write texts (i am studing philosophy in
the university), interneting, unix and networking learning... i just
began coding, but i'm in the printf("Hello World"); fase! Smile

But have a box like it was good for you!! Working with math, without
great resources, maybe forces you to find creative solutions!!

Pitagoras never use a computer!! Smile
rafamonte
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:42 pm

Postby mm_freak on Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:04 am

rafamonte wrote:In my case, i use it just to write texts (i am studing philosophy in
the university), interneting, unix and networking learning... i just
began coding, but i'm in the printf("Hello World"); fase! :)


Code: Select all
puts("Hello world.");  /* better in that case =) */


rafamonte wrote:But have a box like it was good for you!! Working with math, without
great resources, maybe forces you to find creative solutions!!


Yeah, that's true. That's what brought me to use matrices for rotations (and now other transformations as well), instead of trigonometry. =)

rafamonte wrote:Pitagoras never use a computer!! :)


They would have used computers, if they've had any. =)

Fermat would have been excited by a computer. He developed his little theorem without the help of any automatics. It sure was annoying. =)
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Postby rafamonte on Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:15 pm

Please, say if i'm right. Lets see if i made my homework!

In that case, it's better to use puts() because it only works with
strings, and dont make any format translations. So, puts() run
faster than printf().

And about "matrices for rotations" and trigonometry, i have
to say: you are talking greek to me! I was the worst in math
in the school... Smile Probally i will never be a good programer
with my limited math skills.
rafamonte
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:42 pm

Postby mm_freak on Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:55 am

rafamonte wrote:Please, say if i'm right. Lets see if i made my homework!

In that case, it's better to use puts() because it only works with
strings, and dont make any format translations. So, puts() run
faster than printf().


Yes, that's correct. puts(3) also automatically appends the trailing new-line character '\n', which can be good or bad. If you need to print static strings via printf(3), then use something like this:
Code: Select all
printf("%s", "Hello world.\n");

The latter string can be almost anything in that case, even strings read from the network. There are no security implications (except terminal control escape sequences). It's also almost equally fast compared to puts(3). However, talking about speed in the stdio case is a contradiction. =)

rafamonte wrote:And about "matrices for rotations" and trigonometry, i have
to say: you are talking greek to me! I was the worst in math
in the school... :) Probally i will never be a good programer
with my limited math skills.


Don't worry, I've been the worst also (though not anymore). I've had to learn all the math stuff on my own, using Wikipedia or others. You just need interest. =)
I'm x^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1, so don't mess with me!
mm_freak
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany)

Postby Bugs42 on Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:22 am

So, getting back to distros... Wink

I've used RedHat, Mandrake, Knoppix, and a lot of the smaller, lesser-known ones (Tom's RootBoot, Trinux, Xandros, to name a few).
Mandrake used to be my favorite, but I haven't had much luck with the new Mandriva.
Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Bugs42
Valued Member
Valued Member
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:48 pm

Postby najum on Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:21 pm

I mainly use mandrake(mandriva) when I am installing with my own choice. Otherwise Fedora Core X. I have used Slackware too but if I have to install Slackware I'd rather install BSD.
najum
Contributer
Contributer
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:45 pm
Location: Prague, CZ

Postby willdraven on Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:38 pm

I'm currently using gentoo, before that it was slackware with a brief stint with ubuntu between, while i liked ubuntus package management system its default of using gnome (or kde for the kubuntu version) was a bit much for my 450mhz PII Katmai with 192mb of ram, so gentoo+xfce is where i am now.
-=Will^Draven=-
willdraven
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:26 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron