

mm_freak wrote:ravenhair wrote:first let me say I don't believe anything is actuall secure, there are just varing degrees of insecurity.
Take x + y and give the result to someone. He has no way to reconstruct x and y by knowing x + y. This is perfect security. The one-time pad is a system, which makes use of this fact. Anyway, in real world there is no perfect security. A perfectly secure safe would be one, which you couldn't even open yourself. However, current cryptosystems have the security to be unbreakable for the next 500 years and that's enough.ravenhair wrote:At least hack the script so that it requre's a key word in the message.
There is nothing easier to bruteforce than this. If this password is n characters long, then you would bruteforce-check c - n + 1 passwords simultaneously with a string of c characters. This eliminates the need to check one password after another.

Fly wrote:I don't understand anythingx^10 + x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + 1 ???
mm_freak wrote:Slackware users are dreamers. Sorry to say.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest